1. It has come to the attention of forum staff that Dollshe Craft has ceased communications with dealers and customers, has failed to provide promised refunds for the excessive waits, and now has wait times surpassing 5 years in some cases. Forum staff are also concerned as there are claims being put forth that Dollshe plans to close down their doll making company. Due to the instability of the company, the lack of communication, the lack of promised refunds, and the wait times now surpassing 5 years, we strongly urge members to research the current state of this company very carefully and thoroughly before deciding to place an order. For more information please see the Dollshe waiting room. Do not assume this cannot happen to you or that your order will be different.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Dollshe Craft and all dolls created by Dollshe, including any dolls created under his new or future companies, including Club Coco BJD are now banned from Den of Angels. Dollshe and the sculptor may not advertise his products on this forum. Sales may not be discussed, no news threads may be posted regarding new releases. This ban does not impact any dolls by Dollshe ordered by November 8, 2023. Any dolls ordered after November 8, 2023, regardless of the date the sculpt was released, are banned from this forum as are any dolls released under his new or future companies including but not limited to Club Coco BJD. This ban does not apply to other company dolls cast by Dollshe as part of a casting agreement between him and the actual sculpt or company and those dolls may still be discussed on the forum. Please come to Ask the Moderators if you have any questions.
    Dismiss Notice

Artists Using Doll Likenesses without Crediting [Mijn Schatje discussion]

May 31, 2009

    1. Oizys, I'm so curious, if you "desaturate" the image before you Live Trace it, do you get a better result? Mijn's works do have her own color palette, so she doesn't need the color info...
      Also, I haven't done more with Illustrator than read through a tutorial or two, so I don't even know if you *can* desat in Illustrator (I'm a Photoshop geek:)
       
    2. That was what I was trying to say lol fail.
      But yeah and you can very easily color change, just select the layer with the color, and change.
      There's a billion ways to flip, rotate, scale and sheer. (can't spell, sorry) and they're all very easy, click of a mouse, drag and pull and there you go. Takes moments to reuse and fit it into whatever place you want it.
      Makes her actual tracing and work for each image be... The face a body and putting bits into place. Goes from... A weeks time to a few days maybe?
      These are my guesses of course.
       
    3. Actually that is a myth. As I have said before here, if it were to come to a court case (from About.com, several other internet sources, and a lawyer of my aquaintance) it comes to this: a jury of ordinary people is shown the original, the copy, and any manipulation that was done. If they say "it's a copy," the copyist loses the case. As About.com said, paraphrased since most cases go in favor of the original artist you would be insane to take that chance.
       
    4. Victoria Victrix is right, in the US it is "the man on the street" test, where you are pretty much at the mercy of the jury's opinion. It used to be "seven points of difference", but I think that got tossed during the Carter Administration or something, and now we go by eyeball.
       
    5. That is interesting! Especially considering that all of these near identical overlays are like 20+ smoking guns, a pair of bloody gloves that fit, a confession tape, and high definition security footage all smushed in to one colorful package. :lol::lol:
       
    6. All right, before I do this, I would like to take an informal poll. I'm now considering going to art and illustration magazines in the US about this. I am a professional writer, and with radiotrash's help. I can certainly put together an actual article about how this fraud was perpetrated IF any of them ask me to do so (as opposed to having one of their in-house editors do it).

      So here are my questions:

      First: do you want me to start contacting art and graphics magazines.

      Second: if they ask for an article, would you like me to do one?

      IF they actually paid me for the sucker, I would ask them instead to donate the fee to charity (Make A Wish seems like a good place).

      Edit: I know we have writers for Haute Doll and FDQ here, anyone want to contact THEM?
       
    7. That is interesting! Especially considering that all of these near identical overlays are like 20+ smoking guns, a pair of bloody gloves that fit, a confession tape, and high definition security footage all smushed in to one colorful package.

      Would any of the graphic artists in the audience like to render this? XD
       
    8. You can always desat in PS and transfer it to Illustrator. I should give it a try though...
       
    9. Yes! I think that you should contact them. I totally support you in this Victoria Victrix. Many know who you are and I think your name would carry weight if this went to press.
       
    10. I definitely think you should start contacting magazines if Mijn continues her current stance of lying and continuing to put out copied works. Even moreso if she doesn't apologize. If they'd want an article on it, I personally think that'd be a good idea - not everyone browses this corner of the internet, and people do have a right to know the truth about her works.

      I also agree that your experience as a professional writer would help in the matter. =)
       
    11. Victoria Victrix - I say go for it! I think it would be good and if it is just you doing it and not a billion and one different people it's not an overwhelming assult and. Okay blah blah blah I'll avoid a rant and just say do it.
      Make a Wish is good. Or animals. Animals are always good to give to.
       
    12. I agree, do the article! At least if people still like her work, they'll no longer be under the impression that she came up with the look.

      Just think of this BJD publicity O.o
       
    13. Do it! As someone who knows a lot of street artists who are trying to "go pro" The fact that she's been featured on Juxtapose's website really irks me. And I saw reference to Hi-fructose as well?! There are legitimate artists that should be getting the money and contracts she is accepting by doing this.

       
    14. Definitely go for it. There is no way this person should profit from other people's work. At the very least their reputation should reflect what they are really doing - tracing other people's work.

      That's crazy if she's been referenced in Hi-frutose when she traced Audrey Kawasaki's work.
       
    15. Reebok contacted. I believe they take image theft very seriously.
       


    16. Actually DON'T... not until the companies involved as well as the galleries are fully aware of what is going on. Perhaps waiting until the legal actions start. You don't want to get sued for libel or def of character. Also While they might be interested, they probably will not touch it until said time.

      I know it can kill you but wait a month. Then once all the statements have been made, go for it!
       
    17. I agree; hold off until we know for certain one way or another about any possible lawsuits. Magazines won't want to hear that someone may or may not have done something illegal; they like a proper, juicy scandal complete with lawyers rattling their sabres to get their teeth into - at which point you'll have the inside scoop.
       
    18. The sad reality – someone’ll always get famous for swiping a less popular form of art, redoing it, and redistributing it. The fact that it seems so blatant is what scares me.

      I know the BJD world is like that of many collectible trends – you either know, or you don’t – but you’d think people in the art world would check these things out. Guess not, as this woman’s made a name for herself, and a lot of money. It’s a good thing someone did catch it.

      What’s even better is that the word is getting spread, especially to the right ears who have the pull to make sure something appropriate is done about this. Fan artists get ripped off a lot by the big corporations, it’s sort of funny that the reverse is the basis of this issue.

      (An aside, I wish I’d gone public with something I’d seen a MMORPG company do! Maybe I wouldn’t have gotten the brush-off…)
       
    19. I don't have a MySpace account to comment, but has anyone let this group know their "cover art" is traced Audrey Kawasaki?

      http://blogs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.viewcustom&friendId=87625&blogId=244852030&swapped=true

      I don't see any reason to wait, other than for the companies to be notified. Waiting for "legal action" is silly. No one waits for that before writing an expose and no one is going to have a libel or defemation of character suit against them for bringing attention to a something suspect.